For rendering, you might have a look at ConTeXt, because I recall it has an
option whereby Unicode super- and sub-scripts can be displayed over each other
without extra processing.
> On 14 Jan 2020, at 06:44, via Unicode wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply. I think actually LaTeX is not a good o
The reply from Mr Verdy has indeed been helpful, as indeed has also been
an offlist private reply from someone who has, thus far, not been a
participant in this thread.
Mr Verdy wrote:
You seem to have never seen how translation packages work and are used
in common projects (not just CLDR,
William, this is off the Unicode list.
See
http://mathreader.livejournal.com/9239.html
for a list of 207 variants of Chebyshev's name.
---
- Nelson H. F. BeebeTel: +1 801 581 5254
What are the combining marks supposed to look like? Are they your
creation or do you have samples of usage? It is true that you will not
likely get combining marks to work if either they or the base character
are PUA. Adding the complexity of RTL makes the issue worse.
Lorna
On 1/10/2020 12:3
People name are NOT transliterated freely. It's up to each person to
document his romanized name, it should not be invented by automatic
processes. And frequently the romanized name (officialized) does noit match
the original name in another script: this is very frequent for Chinese
people, as well
5 matches
Mail list logo
