> I would just like to know if someone could give me a tip on how to
> structure all the unicode-information in memory?
>
> All the UNIDATA does contain quite a bit of information and I can't see
> any obvious method of which is memory-efficient and gives fast access.
a) you see if there is a Uni
> I don't know if its what Peter was referring to, but there are some
> interesting crash bugs that can happen using Mangal or Latha on Win9x
> -- since neither font is supported on Win9x this is obviously more
> pilot error than product bug (unless it ever repro-ed with a font that
> is okay to p
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Aman Chawla wrote:
> Taking the extra links into account the sizes are:
> English: 10.4 Kb
> Devanagari: 15.0 Kb
> Thus the Dev. page is 1.44 times the Eng. page. For sites providing archives
> of documents/manuscripts (in plain text) in Devanagari, this factor could be
> as
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Philipp Reichmuth wrote:
> What if it is a character where nobody knows for
> sure whether it is a character in its own right or a variant of some
> sort, in orthography, style or whatever?
>
> What is necessary for two signs to constitute different characters in
> cases such
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Darren Morby wrote:
> In The Unicode Standard Version 3.0, the Latin small letters d l and t with
> caron (U+010F, U+013E, U+0165) are actually shown with a trailing apostrophe
> (d', l', t'). On each character there is the following note:
>
> the form using apostrophe is p
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Yung-Fong Tang wrote:
> how can you implement tolower(U+4ff3a) without knowing what U+4ff3a is ?
With a data table. One set of debugged code that handles surrogates,
composing characters, bidirectionality etc. coupled with a datafile that
gets upgraded with each release of
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, William Overington wrote:
[reams on the notion that the forces of glyph encoding may overwhelm
the defenders of Unicode.]
Well yes, people are free to tunnel anything they like in the PUA and
assuming their Unicode applications are willing to allow much larger
datafields tha
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Alain LaBonté wrote:
> À 07:12 2000-07-11 -0800, Doug Ewell a écrit:
> >Many English speakers also think ISO is an abbreviation or initialism
> >(not "acronym"; that term is correct only when the resulting "word"
> >is actually pronounced, like "AIDS" or "SIDA") of the Englis
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
> At 15:30 -0800 on 07/11/00, Asmus Freytag wrote about Re: Euro
> character in ISO:
>
> >There has been an attempt to create a series of 'touched up' 8859
> >standards. The problem with these is that you get all the issues of
> >character
9 matches
Mail list logo
