Sourav,
However, I could not map the block you mentioned to the block names
provided in Unicode site (http://www.unicode.org/charts/). I tried to
map them based on the similarity of names and specified the actual block
down below. Could you please once verify it?
The block names are the ones
The mapping of the HKSCS 2001 repertoire to ISO/IEC 10646-2:2001 has
35 mapped to the private use area
1651 mapped to supplementary plane 2
511 mapped to the Extension A block (on the BMP)
2212 mapped to the CJK Ideographic block (also on the BMP)
plus another 278 mapped elsewhere on the BMP
Muller
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 9:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Does Unicode 3.1 take care of all characters of 'Hong Kong Supplimentary
Character Set - 2001' (HKSCS-2001) ?
John McConnell wrote:
The mapping of the HKSCS 2001 repertoire to ISO/IEC 10646-2:2001 has
35 mapped
A minor correction--EUDCEDIT does convert the bitmap to outline and save them as a
TrueType file.
John
Global Infrastructure
-Original Message-
From: Doug Ewell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 7:19 PM
To: Unicode Mailing List
Cc: Chris Fynn; [EMAIL
.
John
Global Infrastructure
-Original Message-
From: Doug Ewell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:43 AM
To: Unicode Mailing List
Cc: John McConnell
John McConnell johnmcco at windows dot microsoft dot com wrote:
A minor correction--EUDCEDIT does convert
My experience is that the UCS-2 to UTF-16 conversion can be much easier than the SBCS
to DBCS conversion, depending on how your original code is organized.
In the case of Windows, much of the text processing was already done by modules (e.g.
Uniscribe, NLS) that processed text elements rather
Concerning display, there are two separate registry settings:
- in Windows 2000 and Windows XP, you can set a registry value to cause
Uniscribe to load (Uniscribe is required to display supplementary characters).
Alternatively, you could install any of the language packs that require
I'll have somebody a bit more familiar with IE registry usage review that part, but
the rest looks good. Thanks.
John
Global Infrastructure
-Original Message-
From: Tex Texin [mailto:tex;i18nguy.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 10:41 AM
To: John McConnell
Cc: Andrew C. West
Both the Persian (Farsi) keyboard and the Devanagari keyboard include both ZWJ and
ZWNJ. ZWJ is 1+Shift+Ctrl, while ZWNJ is 2+Shift+Ctrl. The problem appears with the
reference tool. I've notified the folks who maintain that site. Thanks for pointing
out the problem.
FWIW, the same keys are
I can confirm Hiura-san's version. I heard it from Jurgen Bettels, who've I've known
since '84 and worked with Scherpenhuizen in the Geneva office at the time.
Scherpenhuizen managed the ISO work.
In the days when bytes were precious, VMS had a character username limit. Some
anonymous system
rather
than the user However we found it caused too many problems for existing applications,
which assumed that there was only one setting in effect at a time In NET, the two
values are grouped together in the RegionInfo class
John McConnell
Windows Globalization Infrastructure Design Development
Title: Message
The ISCII code pages is DLL-based, not table based. So if you have the
file c_iscii.dll in your system32 folder, you have the
support.
The DLL ships with allconfigurations (I just confirmed that it was
on the Windows 2000 CD) and will be installed if you install the Indic
Title: Message
Right, there is a section of intl.inf allows you to install optional code
pages and that populates the list you see under Advanced Regional Options.
Through an oversight, c_iscii.dll isn't in that section
in Windows 2000--it's installed if and only if you install the
Windows XP has some modest improvements for surrogate support. The info may not be on
MSDN yet, so here's a summary:
- there are just two optional language packs (one for East Asian and one for the
rest). If either is installed, usp10.dll (Uniscribe) is installed and you'll get
surrogate
Title: RE: lag time in Unicode implementations in OS, etc?
Windows 2000 does support surrogates as defined in Unicode 2.0 e.g. it recognizes them when
converting to/from UTF-8 OpenType recognizes new cmap types for surrogates.
The remaining steps e.g. fonts that display Ext B and sorting
, then the layout engine will ignore them anyway until fonts provide that data.
markus
John McConnell wrote:
Windows 2000 does support surrogates as defined in Unicode 2.0 e.g. it recognizes them when
converting to/from UTF-8 OpenType recognizes new cmap types for surrogates.
that's great
16 matches
Mail list logo
