RE: Anyone who can write Hindi on the Unicode List?

characters alone isn't enough... is that on the right track? Best regards, Gary At 02:00 AM 11/21/2002 , Joseph Boyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The page already has the corrected appearance when I view it on IE6 / XP, but the incorrect appearance on IE5.5 / NT4. I am guessing that his Windows

RE: Names for UTF-8 with and without BOM - pragmatic

Working in a large organization whose product includes a large number of configuration and data files in text formats, I can say something about what we have found to work during development, localization, and release engineering, across multiple platforms . We have eliminated UTF-16 text file

PRODUCING and DESCRIBING UTF-8 with and without BOM

To: Doug Ewell; Unicode Mailing List Cc: Murray Sargent; Joseph Boyle Subject: Re: Names for UTF-8 with and without BOM Little probability that right double quote would appear at the start of a document either. Doesn't mean that you are free to delete it (*and* say that you are not modifying

RE: PRODUCING and DESCRIBING UTF-8 with and without BOM

in an argument separate from the charset name? As said before this unnecessarily requires extra logic. Joseph -Original Message- From: Michael (michka) Kaplan [mailto:michka;trigeminal.com] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 7:23 AM To: Joseph Boyle; Unicode Mailing List Subject: Re: PRODUCING

RE: PRODUCING and DESCRIBING UTF-8 with and without BOM

Yes, it's trivial to check. What's missing is the notation to tell the checker what to check for. Sorry, but that is incorrect. If they know its UTF-8, then its either a BOM or its not. It is three specific bytes. No, the notation to say BOM required (report any files without BOM), BOM not

RE: Names for UTF-8 with and without BOM

The first time I thought of UTF-8Y it sounded too flippant, but actually it is fairly self-explanatory if UTF-8 is taken as a given, and has the virtue of being short. UTF-8S for signature would also make sense, but is the same as the name of Toby Phipps's proposal which eventually became CESU-8.

RE: Names for UTF-8 with and without BOM

- From: Michael (michka) Kaplan [mailto:michka;trigeminal.com] Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 10:16 AM To: Joseph Boyle; Mark Davis; Murray Sargent Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Names for UTF-8 with and without BOM From: Joseph Boyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Type Encoding Comment .txt UTF-8BOM

Names for UTF-8 with and without BOM

It would be useful to have official names to distinguish UTF-8 with and without BOM. (or, with, without, and agnostic) Here are a couple of examples I'm currently involved with: * I'm writing an encoding checker to validate a long list of text file formats we use internally. HTML and XML only