ECMAScript 6 fixed that, largely along the lines of my proposal:
http://norbertlindenberg.com/2012/05/ecmascript-supplementary-characters/index.html
Norbert
> On Aug 24, 2017, at 22:14 , Peter Constable via Unicode
> wrote:
>
> I thought Javascript had a UCS-2 understanding of Unicode strings
> On Feb 18, 2018, at 3:26 , Khaled Hosny via Unicode
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 02:14:46AM -0800, James Kass via Unicode wrote:
>> Adam Borowski wrote,
>>
>>> I'm looking for a way to determine a font's coverage of available scripts.
>>> It's probably reasonable to do this per Unico
The section on consonant shifters in the Khmer section of the Unicode standard
(page 647 of Unicode 11 [1]) isn’t entirely clear on where the zero width
non-joiner should be placed to prevent a consonant shifter that’s followed by
an above-base vowel from being changed to a below-base glyph.
Fi
3 matches
Mail list logo