Hello again,
my apologies if me language challenged caused some of you to regard my post
about threads as a threat ;)
Stefan
At 23:54 26.02.2002 -0500, I wrote:
-
>Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 16:49:52 +0700
>From: Stefan Probst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject:
Good Evening,
can somebody pls. explain to me dummy, what the long threats about
R(o|u)mania, Canada, California, Yankees, and Initials in various
countries..
have to do with Unicode?
Maybe I don't understand the deeper implications not yet? ;)
Cheers,
Stefan
Good Morning,
There is a new version of the relevant document (still in draft) out since
yesterday. You may want to check it:
http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod/
It is stated there under 4.3:
>[S] [I] A text-processing component that receives suspect text MUST NOT
>perform any normalization-sensitiv
Hello Doug,
Actually, it seems like IE would do it like you describe: try to normalize
to NFC/NFKC and display that. MS Word does not. When looking in different
sizes, the glyphs look quite ugly, since they are really combined: The dot
below for example is only sometimes exactly below the vowe
At 30 Jan 2002 11:38:37 -0500, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-
>Stefan Probst wrote:
> > And since we are already in Vietnamese (to round the things up):
> > I am not sure, how e.g. in the introduction to dictionaries or
> > Vietnames
Hello Doug,
concluding from how well you understood the issue (including your case 5),
one could think, you were Vietnamese ;)
It is exactly the "dot below" which makes the most problems, since its
combining class (220) is lower than some of the modifiers (230).
And unfortunately other tonal m
On Wed Jan 16 23:49:29 2002 +0400 Aman Chawla wrote:
>Are there any search engines at all at present which allow one to search
>sites encoded in UTF-8? If not, are there plans to build such search
>engines? For example, is Google going to implement such an engine?
I would like to add:
How do th
7 matches
Mail list logo
