Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?

2004-05-19 Thread Youtie Effaight
Golly gee, all this Phoenecianan talk just makes me wanna sing dance! Yee-Haw! Oh Lord let me flog yet another dead horse I ain't got a life so I love it of course Just hand me a whip and I will be so glad So lord let me flog yet another dead horse! Yer ol' pal, Youtie

Re: What is the principle?

2004-03-31 Thread Youtie Effaight
On: 2004-03-31 06:43:38 -0800 Peter Kirk peterkirk at qaya.org scribed: The only alternative I see is to rewrite from scratch the display routines of my favourite OS. I think banging my head against walls is likely to be faster. After all, even the hardest wall cracks eventually, and my head is

Re: Valid encodings

2003-08-14 Thread Youtie Effaight
Just a while back there, Jony Rosenne wrote: We need an official Unicode Lint. Jony Lint? Oh, do you mean a program that polices mail list replies and eliminates those snappy one-line replies that quote over 150 lines of the original message for no particular purpose? Yer ol' pal, Youtie

Re: Revised N2586R

2003-06-25 Thread Youtie Effaight
Speaking of Orwellian nightmare scenarios, I don't get this reference. I read Homage to Catalonia, but could someone please explain this Orwellian nightmare? I can't figure out, what does the Spanish civil war have to do with Unicode? Yer ol' pal, Youtie

Re: XML and tags (LONG) (derives from Re: Plane 14 Tag Deprecation Issue)

2003-02-21 Thread Youtie Effaight
Mr. William Overington wrote responding to Marco... ... you pretend to respond to a non-existent company which cannot vote in elections yet which may be able to pay to have a vote at a Unicode Technical Committee meeting, which an individual cannot do! :-) As far as I know, nothing in the

Re: A .notdef glyph

2002-11-07 Thread Youtie Effaight
Michael Everson wrote: At 10:53 + 2002-11-07, William Overington wrote: In fact, I will try to write it up in the form of a case history in the style of a portfolio item for a National Vocational Qualification portfolio of the system used in England. Please don't. William, no one really

Re: [semi-OT]Primer on message catalog for l10n techniques

2002-10-01 Thread Youtie Effaight
Barry wrote ... The thread last week on comet circumflex briefly veered ... While surfing over the weekend, I came across a presentation Which leads us to RFC 1925 and the eleventh truth of networking: (11) Every old idea will be proposed again with a different name and a

Re: POSITIVELY MUST READ! Bytext is here!

2002-01-25 Thread Youtie Effaight
Unicode now has a serious competitor. Please read about it at www.bytext.org. Everyone on this list should find it extremely interesting. Goll dang! Just what ah've bin waitin' fer! Code points is gettin' way too expensive in Unicode, so I sure hope bytext is sellin' 'em cheaper. Yer ol' pal,

Unicode in the balance (was Re: What constitutes character?)

2001-11-09 Thread Youtie Effaight
Howdy there... I've been following this thread about the deficiencies of Unicode, and its pretty much a hoot and a holler. If anyone can devise a better solution, please feel free to stage a coup d'etat and overthrow the hegemony of Unicode. I'm sure it could be done better: in an ideal world

Re: First of many newbie questions

2001-06-15 Thread Youtie Effaight
it! Don't like 'em? Vote 'em out! -- Youtie Effaight (Argonaut in Training) -- _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

UTF-8S: an immodest proposal

2001-06-13 Thread Youtie Effaight
There has been a whole gob of e-mail exchanged recently in all of this controversy about UTF-8S. As a casual observer, I would like to take this opportunity to point out some things. The kind of end-user input floating around on the Unicode list is very important and I'm sure UTC people