Thanks for all the comments.
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl (Janusz S. Bień) wrote:
[...]
> First, is "semivirgula" a good name? Google shows that it often refers
> to semicolon. "Caudatum" seems to me even more misleading because it
> should refer simply to ogonek (to the best of my
nicode.org [mailto:unicode-bou...@unicode.org] On Behalf
Of Janusz S. Bien
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 7:57 AM
To: unicode@unicode.org
Subject: ,,semi-virgula''
I apologize for possible duplication. I've send this message already
yesterday, but it hasn't appeared on the li
Hello,
Am 2010-08-31 16:57, schrieb Janusz S. Bień:
Can the diacritic be interpreted
as an already exisiting combining character?
Perhaps:
0326 Combining comma below
0329 Combining vertical line below
0337 Combining short solidus overlay
Cheers,
Otto Stolz
2010/8/31 Janusz S. Bień :
> First, is "semivirgula" a good name? Google shows that it often refers
> to semicolon.
I’m no specialist and I have no idea about what’s the original name of
that diacritic, but “virgula” is the name of the comma in medieval
manuscripts[1]. To this day it’s the word f
4 matches
Mail list logo
