Paul Keinanen wrote:
> At 16.10 22.7.2000 -0800, jgo wrote:
> >> Addison wrote:
> >> 1. 1 byte != 1 character: deal with it.
> >
> >Hmm, depends on how you define "byte".
> >I've seen them in 8-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit and 18-bit varieties.
> >
> >The trouble, though, is that 1 character (in this cont
Kenneth Whistler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>So the first step to interoperability in big, interconnected system
>software using C is to set up fundamental header files containing
>well-defined datatypes of fixed sizes, to make up for the lack of same
>in the definition of C itself. The lack of f
Torsten responded:
> > The lack of fixed-size datatypes in C
> >is now a *defect* in the language, and not an *asset* of the language.
>
> The latest revision of ISO C has introduced exact-width integer types
> (like "int8_t", "int16_t" and so on). These are also straightforward
> names rather t
3 matches
Mail list logo
