).
Patrick's original question concerned an undocumented, but arguably legal,
way of using the Unicode interlinear annotation characters.
Martin's response makes it sound as though the annotation characters have the
Plane 14 nature: they were brought into this world with strong warnings never
to use
At 01:57 PM 7/23/01 +0900, Martin Duerst wrote:
The language here is slightly different, and I have no idea whether
the intent was exactly the same, but in any case it seems that the
intents were very close to each other.
IA characters were from the beginning intended for in-process use, in
Hello Patrick,
You can find a better way to do furigana, and an answer to many
of your questions, at http://www.w3.org/TR/ruby (the Ruby Annotation
Recommendation).
Regards, Martin.
At 18:40 01/07/19 -0400, Patrick Andries wrote:
Just a small question about annotation characters.
If I
Just a small question about annotation characters.
If I understand p. 326 this sequence should be valid :
IAAU+723BIAS ne, ko IAS cat IAT.
Is this the case ?
If so, does such an annotation character sequence have any application
in Japanese typography ? In other words, does one find double
P. Andries wrote:
I'm still interested by a definition of in(-)line software
(http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr27/). I know what inline code
or processing could be but I can't quite understand the relationship
with the inline software mentioned here and processing music text.
The
5 matches
Mail list logo
