> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 20:52:15 +0100
> From: Richard Wordingham via Unicode
>
> > > > I'm well aware of the official position. However, when we
> > > > attempted to implement it unconditionally in Emacs, some people
> > > > objected, and brought up good reasons. You can, of course, elect
> >
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:43:23 +0300
Eli Zaretskii via Unicode wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:23:59 +0100
> > From: Richard Wordingham via Unicode
> >
> > > I'm well aware of the official position. However, when we
> > > attempted to implement it unconditionally in Emacs, some people
> >
> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:23:59 +0100
> From: Richard Wordingham via Unicode
>
> > I'm well aware of the official position. However, when we attempted
> > to implement it unconditionally in Emacs, some people objected, and
> > brought up good reasons. You can, of course, elect to disregard th
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 21:41:19 +0300
Eli Zaretskii via Unicode wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:29:39 +0100
> > From: Richard Wordingham via Unicode
> > The official position is that text that is canonically
> > equivalent is the same. There are problem areas where traditional
> > modes of e
4 matches
Mail list logo