RE: Apparent discrepanccy between FAQ and Age.txt

2014-06-10 Thread Whistler, Ken
Karl Williamson noted: > The FAQ http://www.unicode.org/faq/private_use.html#sentinels > says that the last 2 code points on the planes except BMP were made > noncharacters in TUS 3.1. DerivedAge.txt gives 2.0 for these. > The *concept* of noncharacter was not invented until Unicode 3.1, so it

Re: Apparent discrepanccy between FAQ and Age.txt

2014-06-10 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Hello, Karl Williamson wrote: |The FAQ http://www.unicode.org/faq/private_use.html#sentinels |says that the last 2 code points on the planes except BMP were made |noncharacters in TUS 3.1. DerivedAge.txt gives 2.0 for these. The (nothing but informational except for @missing lines) comments

Apparent discrepanccy between FAQ and Age.txt

2014-06-10 Thread Karl Williamson
The FAQ http://www.unicode.org/faq/private_use.html#sentinels says that the last 2 code points on the planes except BMP were made noncharacters in TUS 3.1. DerivedAge.txt gives 2.0 for these. "The conformance wording about U+FFFE and U+ changed somewhat in Unicode 2.0, but these were stil