Re: CJK Unified Ideographs Range

2003-02-21 Thread Kenneth Whistler
Andrew followed up: Maybe what I'm really trying to ask is, if sometime in the future we start to run out of space in the BMP, could U+9FB0 through U+9FFF be reallocated to some new script, or is the allocation of these 80 codepoints to the CJK block permanent and irrevocable ? Please study

Re: CJK Unified Ideographs Range

2003-02-20 Thread Andrew C. West
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 01:39:58 -0800 (PST), Kenneth Whistler wrote: TYPE 11: Block ranges match in Unicode and 10646, for blocks with generated character names, but NamesList.txt shows a mismatched range. 4E00 CJK Unified Ideographs 9FA5 4E00..9FFF; CJK Unified Ideographs CJK UNIFIED

Re: CJK Unified Ideographs Range

2003-02-20 Thread Mark Davis
, February 20, 2003 01:48 Subject: Re: CJK Unified Ideographs Range On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 01:39:58 -0800 (PST), Kenneth Whistler wrote: TYPE 11: Block ranges match in Unicode and 10646, for blocks with generated character names, but NamesList.txt shows a mismatched range. 4E00 CJK Unified

CJK Unified Ideographs Range

2003-02-19 Thread Andrew C. West
I've asked this question before, but I've never had a satisfactory response, so I'll ask it again now that Unicode 4 is due to be released soon. Section 10.1 of the Unicode Standard, as well as Blocks-4.0.0.txt, give the range of the CJK Unified Ideographs block as U+4E00 through U+9FFF, whereas

Re: CJK Unified Ideographs Range

2003-02-19 Thread Kenneth Whistler
Andrew asked: I've asked this question before, but I've never had a satisfactory response, so I'll ask it again now that Unicode 4 is due to be released soon. Section 10.1 of the Unicode Standard, as well as Blocks-4.0.0.txt, give the range of the CJK Unified Ideographs block as U+4E00