From: "Kent Karlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The problem is that to express the alt 2 as an ICU tailoring I need
> an "anchor" at level 3, which is ignored at levels 1 and 2. I'm not
> sure if I can use a punctuation character (ignored at levels 1-3) as
> such an anchor, esp. not since punctuation c
Peter Kirk wrote:
On 03/11/2003 15:26, Markus Scherer wrote:
I suggest you try it out -
http://oss.software.ibm.com/cgi-bin/icu/lx/en_US/utf-8/?_=he&EXPLORE_CollationElements=
ICU implements the UCA, including discontiguous contractions.
Thank you, Markus. Unfortunately the results are barely u
[this should go back to the Hebrew list only...]
> But your mention of ignoring non-blocking combining marks when
> processing contractions made me look at the newly released
> http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr10/. I noticed there for the first
> time, maybe because they are there for the first
On 03/11/2003 15:26, Markus Scherer wrote:
I suggest you try it out -
http://oss.software.ibm.com/cgi-bin/icu/lx/en_US/utf-8/?_=he&EXPLORE_CollationElements=
ICU implements the UCA, including discontiguous contractions.
markus
Thank you, Markus. Unfortunately the results are barely usable bec
I suggest you try it out -
http://oss.software.ibm.com/cgi-bin/icu/lx/en_US/utf-8/?_=he&EXPLORE_CollationElements=
ICU implements the UCA, including discontiguous contractions.
markus
Peter Kirk wrote:
On 03/11/2003 07:01, Kent Karlsson wrote:
However, the UCA does ignore differences between or
On 03/11/2003 07:01, Kent Karlsson wrote:
...
However, the UCA does ignore differences between order of
*"non-blocking"* (**different** non-zero combining classes)
combining marks **when processing contractions**.
...
Kent, thanks for the hint. For the last few weeks I have been
complaining l
6 matches
Mail list logo
