Re: Continue: Glaring mistake in nomenclature , should it have been " Assamese" ?

2011-09-15 Thread tulasi
us. You have been a thread to U.S moral-core-principles? How long have you been a bulldog for Magda Danish? Did Magda tell you what it did with unicode hot f**k portal recently? Tulasi From: Michael Everson Date: Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:14 AM Subject: Re: Continue: Glaring mistake in nomencl

Re: Continue: Glaring mistake in nomenclature , should it have been " Assamese" ?

2011-09-14 Thread Asmus Freytag
On 9/14/2011 11:14 AM, Michael Everson wrote: At this point, I think I have to make a plea: Sarasvati, spare us. +1

Re: Continue: Glaring mistake in nomenclature , should it have been " Assamese" ?

2011-09-14 Thread Michael Everson
On 14 Sep 2011, at 18:58, delex r wrote: > ## I think s/he has given and finished her/his his point about why the name > of the script is chosen as “Bengali” ….. The English knew “Calcutta” as > such why have you changed it to “Kolkata” ? Well irrelevant from the > point of view of enco

Continue: Glaring mistake in nomenclature , should it have been " Assamese" ?

2011-09-14 Thread delex r
Shriramana Sharma wrote : >Look -- Unicode is an international standard. English is the >international language of science and technology, whether you like it or >not. And as Michael Everson as pointed out, the script is more commonly >known in the English language as the Bengali script …..