On 10/09/2011 04:53, delex r wrote:
I figure out that Unicode has not addressed the sovereignty issues of a
language while trying to devise an ASCII like encoding system for almost all
the characters and symbols used on earth.
.
The Unicode encodes writing systems not languages - it
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 02:02:09AM +, Doug Ewell wrote:
English, French, German, Dutch, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, Swedish, and
Polish are all different languages. Each has its own pronunciation,
vocabulary, orthography, national identity, and rich literary tradition.
Would you
Hi Unicode Community!
I recommend to Unicode that this grievance is taken into account. No one
consonant in this code range is used by only one language. Refer:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Nagari_alphabet#Consonants
The Indian census of 1961 recognised 1,652 different languages in
Anbu Kaveeswarar Selvaraju anbu at peoplestring dot com wrote:
The Bengali alphabet (Bengali: বাংলা লিপি bangla lipi or Bengali:
বঙ্গলিপি
bôņgôlipi) is the writing system for the Bengali language. The same
script
is the basis for the Assamese, Meitei, Bishnupriya Manipuri, Kokborok,
Garo
and
[mailto:unicode-bou...@unicode.org] On Behalf
Of a...@peoplestring.com
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 2:09 AM
To: kent.karlsso...@telia.com
Cc: del...@indiatimes.com; unicode@unicode.org
Subject: Re: Continue:Glaring mistake in the code list for South Asian Script
Hi Unicode Community!
I
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:33:47 +0600
Chridtopher Fynn chris.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Characters only used for writing Assamese in the Bengali block is
similar. As long as you can type all the characters necessary for
writing your language, don't worry about names.
Actually, names sometimes
On 09/09/2011 08:12 PM, Peter Constable wrote (responding to
del...@indiatimes.com):
Thus, what you refer to as a glaring mistake is not a mistake at all when
considered in relation to what the intent and usage within the Standard is--and what it
is _not_.
More significantly, it doesn't even
I figure out that Unicode has not addressed the sovereignty issues of a
language while trying to devise an ASCII like encoding system for almost all
the characters and symbols used on earth. I am continuing with my observation
of the glaring mistake done by Unicode by naming a South Asian
: Continue:Glaring mistake in the code list for South Asian Script
I figure out that Unicode has not addressed the sovereignty issues of a
language while trying to devise an ASCII like encoding system for almost all
the characters and symbols used on earth. I am continuing with my observation
of the glaring
Den 2011-09-10 00:53, skrev delex r del...@indiatimes.com:
I figure out that Unicode has not addressed the sovereignty issues of a
language
Which, I daresay, is irrelevant from a *character* encoding perspective.
while trying to devise an ASCII like encoding system for almost all
the
English, French, German, Dutch, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, Swedish, and
Polish are all different languages. Each has its own pronunciation, vocabulary,
orthography, national identity, and rich literary tradition.
Would you suggest that the letters used in each of these languages should be
11 matches
Mail list logo
