Kenneth Whistler quoted and wrote:
> > > From: "Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > On 2003.05.25, 00:00, Philippe Verdy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > even if the Dutch language considers it as a single letter,
in a
> > > > > way similar to the Spanish "ch"
> > > >
> >
Peter Constable schreef:
> Whatever happened to CGJ?
Too new, probably.
People (and software applications) aren't used to this one yet.
Pim Blokland
> I think he meant (the zero-width joiner) used as as markup to
> create a ligated variant of a pair of characters
Whatever happened to CGJ?
- Peter
---
Peter Constable
Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
75
From: "Pim Blokland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Unicode mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: Dutch IJ, again
> Philippe Verdy schreef:
>
> > i+j is a single combined Dutch ij character only if its not
Philippe Verdy schreef:
> i+j is a single combined Dutch ij character only if its not
followed by a vowel
This is not true; where did you get that idea?
It almost always IS a diphtong (cf words like bijen, vrijaf, zijig)
except where the i and the j happen to be in separate syllables
(bijou, bije
Philippe Verdy continued:
> From: "Mark Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > From: "Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > On 2003.05.25, 00:00, Philippe Verdy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > even if the Dutch language considers it as a single letter, in a
> > > > way similar to the Sp
From: "Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 2003.05.25, 00:00, Philippe Verdy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > even if the Dutch language considers it as a single letter, in a
> > way similar to the Spanish "ch"
>
> I see one major difference: When you apply extra wide inter-char
> d
From: "Mark Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On 2003.05.25, 00:00, Philippe Verdy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > even if the Dutch language considers it as a single letter, in a
> > > way similar to the Spanish "ch"
> >
> > I see one major di
MAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 08:03
Subject: Re: Dutch IJ, again
> On 2003.05.25, 00:00, Philippe Verdy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > even if the Dutch language considers it as a single letter, in a
> > way similar to the Span
On 2003.05.25, 00:00, Philippe Verdy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> even if the Dutch language considers it as a single letter, in a
> way similar to the Spanish "ch"
I see one major difference: When you apply extra wide inter-char
distance, you (should) get, f.i.:
K o r t r ij k and not
10 matches
Mail list logo
