I’m sure this is old hat to many, but I’ve just seen my first block
1F600 emoticon used “for real” in an email. The character was U+1F61E
DISAPPOINTED FACE, from the context I believe this had been deliberately
chosen by the email’s author, not a mistake. Unfortunately, as the email
was relayed
On 26 Jul 2012, at 09:56, Ian Clifton wrote:
I’m sure this is old hat to many, but I’ve just seen my first block 1F600
emoticon used “for real” in an email.
You're welcome. :-)
The character was U+1F61E DISAPPOINTED FACE, from the context I believe this
had been deliberately chosen by the
Not emoticon but …….
I received an email from Email Insider. Email was written as E✉ail
✉ being U+2079
I thought it quite clever
André
On 2012/07/26, at 9:56, Ian Clifton wrote:
I’m sure this is old hat to many, but I’ve just seen my first block
1F600 emoticon used “for real” in an email.
2012/7/26 Michael Everson ever...@evertype.com:
Hm. I note that Everson Mono does not have glyphs for these yet (as I cannot
see them in your mail.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
Have you solved your past problem of limits with your font editor tool
(Fontographer ?) or are you
2012-07-26 13:04, Andre Schappo kirjoitti:
Not emoticon but …….
I received an email from Email Insider. Email was written as E✉ail
✉ being U+2079
I thought it quite clever
U+2079 is SUPERSCRIPT NINE “⁹”. I suppose you meant U+2709 ENVELOPE “✉”,
an old (Unicode 1.0.0) dingbat (which now
On 7/26/2012 3:50 AM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
2012-07-26 13:04, Andre Schappo kirjoitti:
Not emoticon but …….
I received an email from Email Insider. Email was written as E✉ail
✉ being U+2079
I thought it quite clever
U+2079 is SUPERSCRIPT NINE “⁹”. I suppose you meant U+2709 ENVELOPE
6 matches
Mail list logo
