On 06/04/2002 05:13:09 AM Peter_Constable wrote:
>I understand. I'm not arguing at this point that the combining classes
>should be changed (though I would were it a possibility) -- if you look at
>my earlier post in this thread, you'll see that I explained to Khun
Samphan
>that this is not a po
On 06/03/2002 05:56:38 PM Kenneth Whistler wrote:
>Peter,
>The problem, of course, is that not all eventualities could be
>foreseen at the time the decisions had to be made -- when normalization
>and Unicode 3.0 were looming...
>So hindsight is 20/20. But at the time, the editors and participa
Peter,
> On 06/02/2002 05:40:05 AM Samphan Raruenrom wrote:
>
> >> My opinion is that they should have been simplified, but that setting
> the
> >> bulk of them to 0 was a mistake and creates some significant problems
> >> (which go a step beyond the questions you raise here).
> >
> >Can you ela
On 06/02/2002 05:40:05 AM Samphan Raruenrom wrote:
>> My opinion is that they should have been simplified, but that setting
the
>> bulk of them to 0 was a mistake and creates some significant problems
>> (which go a step beyond the questions you raise here).
>
>Can you elaborate on this?
Given
4 matches
Mail list logo
