Fw: Karelian ASSR

2002-12-26 Thread Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin
This is a forwarded message -- some marginally intersting notes about real-world implemantation of combining diacriticals and about karelian orthographies. From: Marco Pribilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sunday, December 22, 2002, 9:00:22 PM Subjec

Re: Fw: Karelian ASSR

2002-12-27 Thread Valeriy E. Ushakov
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 01:43:48 +, Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin wrote: > due to the new language law of the Russian Federation that makes > Cyrillics compulsory for all the languages within the Federation. That's a very controversial law, but one correction is due nonetheless: "for all *state*

Re: Fw: Karelian ASSR

2003-01-02 Thread Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin
On 2002.12.27, 13:55, Valeriy E. Ushakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Constitution says that the republics shall have the right to institute > their own state languages. This law puts a constraint on that right. > My understanding is that if a republic wants to institute a state > language that i

Re: Fw: Karelian ASSR

2003-01-02 Thread Radovan Garabik
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 04:55:19PM +0300, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 01:43:48 +, Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin wrote: > > > due to the new language law of the Russian Federation that makes > > Cyrillics compulsory for all the languages within the Federation. > > That's a

Re[2]: Fw: Karelian ASSR

2003-01-14 Thread Serge Nesterovitch
Hello Anto'nio, Thursday, January 2, 2003, 3:27:50 PM, you wrote: AnMTl> On 2002.12.27, 13:55, Valeriy E. Ushakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Constitution says that the republics shall have the right to institute >> their own state languages. This law puts a constraint on that right. >> My un