Hi,
Would anybody be able to point me to possible ISCII-Unicode conversion utilities/APIs?
How reliable is the conversion?
How well is Hindi supported by the UTF8-Internet Explorer combination?
Your expertise is GREATLY appreciated.
Best,
Etienne
John:
>In Windows 2000, you could not install the ISCII code page as an optional code
>page--only by installing the Indic language group.
Strange. I have it (and all lg groups) installed, and the c_iscii.dll file is in my system32 folder, but the codepages mentioned don't show up in my Advance
Title: Message
Right, there is a section of intl.inf allows you to install optional code
pages and that populates the list you see under Advanced Regional Options.
Through an oversight, c_iscii.dll isn't in that section
in Windows 2000--it's installed if and only if you install the
Indic lan
e-From: Michael (michka)
Kaplan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 07,
2001 9:51 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Unicode
ListSubject: Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion
May be a stupid question, but have you actually
*tried* to convert anything using the code page values I
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 11:17:50AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 2001-11-08 7:19:19 Pacific Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Any freely available info on ISO 9995, or do I have to pay through the
> > nose for the privilege of learning about it?
I have a
Marco Cimarosti writes:
> Tom Emerson wrote:
> > One gotcha, that I run into every six months or so, is forgetting that
> > the punctuation characters in the Basic Latin block are classified as
> > Latin script. This trips me up because most of my text processing work
> > involves CJK, so I'll wri
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Arjun Aggarwal wrote:
> Hello everybody
>
>
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Philipp Reichmuth wrote
> > I've been wondering a little bit recently about the definition of
> > "character" vs. "glyph variant" that is applied during decision
> > whether or not a given proposed character s
Below is Ken Whistler's historical table of codespace counts, extracted from
the message "Is 879,309 enough?" and slightly refurbished, followed by the
Unicode 3.2 codespace allocation map (cf. http://www.unicode.org/roadmaps ).
Your terminology may differ, but here's what's used below:
BMP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Any suggestions on what the right way to deal with "surrogate" codepoints
> in this algorithm? They should not occur in the data, but what if they do?
Either encode them as 3-byte UTF-8, or throw an exception etc.
Note that ISO 10646-UTF-8 forbids encoding them at all
On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, John H. Jenkins wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, November 6, 2001, at 09:41 AM, Michael Everson wrote:
>
> > John Jenkins said:
> >
> >> Ah, but you should never underestimate the power of the Force. Remember
> >> that the IRG is *already* looking to adding some 60,000 ideographs for
>
10 matches
Mail list logo