What is demonstrated here is how to build a CID-keyed font supporting the
the "unencoded glyphs" using IDS pseudo-encoding + OpenType "ccmp" (or
alternatively "liga") feature. It speaks about an Adobe registry ("ROS")
for some supported lexical dictionnaries, where encoded codepoints or
unencoded g
Maybe, some precomposed glyphs (without standardized code points) are included
in the font, and the registered IDS strings are internally converted to the
glyph index to them, by ligature feature of OpenType. I guess, the
"composition"-like behaviour is just visible for the set of IDS registered in
Seems like Source Han Serif have just implemented such functionality? Or is
this just partial. https://twitter.com/tualatrix/status/849178587680735232
font.
2016-08-05 3:26 GMT+08:00 Thomas H Gewecke :
>
> On Aug 4, 2016, at 2:45 PM, gfb hjjhjh wrote:
>
> That Wikipedia page also have a section named as "Ideographic Description
> Sequences" which is exactly forming sequences base on those ideographic
> descr
nsion become
> something integrated into a font.
>
> 2016-08-05 3:26 GMT+08:00 Thomas H Gewecke :
>
>>
>> On Aug 4, 2016, at 2:45 PM, gfb hjjhjh wrote:
>>
>> That Wikipedia page also have a section named as "Ideographic Description
>> Sequenc
s" which is exactly forming sequences base on
those ideographic description characters
As I understand it, such sequences may provide a “description” of
kanji useful for some purposes, but are not sufficient to
properly “render” them.
into a font.
2016-08-05 3:26 GMT+08:00 Thomas H Gewecke :
>
> On Aug 4, 2016, at 2:45 PM, gfb hjjhjh wrote:
>
> That Wikipedia page also have a section named as "Ideographic Description
> Sequences" which is exactly forming sequences base on those ideographic
> descr
Hi,
the IDS provide too little information for rendering kanji properly. Take a
look into
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_character_description_languages .
Hello,
As I read that it is possible for an implementation of Unicode that can
render those ideographic description characters into
Hello,
As I read that it is possible for an implementation of Unicode that can
render those ideographic description characters into rendering the kanji it
describe, but is there any known/existing system or font or implementation
that would do exactly this?
On Dec 8, 2003, at 6:20 PM, Mark Davis wrote:
John, I don't see why you are saying that it is a 'no-no'. There is no
reason
that someone couldn't do something like that.
Strictly speaking, it isn't in violation of TUS, which only says (p.
309), "Ideographic Description Sequences are not to be
n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Jenkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Unicode List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon, 2003 Dec 08 16:55
Subject: Re: Ideographic Description Characters
> John Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Dec 8, 2
John Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Dec 8, 2003, at 3:15 AM, Andrew C. West wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:25:01 -0700, Tom Gewecke wrote:
>>>
>>> Can anyone tell me whether ideographic description characters are ever
>>> actually u
On Dec 8, 2003, at 10:25 AM, Philippe Verdy wrote:
At least, IDC would really speed up the work of unification of various
repertoire sources and help avoid duplicates. It seems that, even if
IDC
allows several compositions, a sort of canonical ideographic
decomposition
(not a NFD or NFKD decomp
John Jenkins
> The IRG is attempting to set up a database of existing ideographs using
> IDSs (strictly speaking, this is a no-no, but they understand that).
> This will help in the analysis of submitted ideographs and speed up the
> process of encoding.
At least, IDC would really speed up the
On Dec 8, 2003, at 3:15 AM, Andrew C. West wrote:
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:25:01 -0700, Tom Gewecke wrote:
Can anyone tell me whether ideographic description characters are ever
actually used?
Well, I use them on a couple of my web pages to describe unencoded
ideographs
(try viewing
http
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:25:01 -0700, Tom Gewecke wrote:
>
> Can anyone tell me whether ideographic description characters are ever
> actually used?
Well, I use them on a couple of my web pages to describe unencoded ideographs
(try viewing http://uk.geocities.com/BabelStone1357/
Can anyone tell me whether ideographic description characters are ever
actually used? I recently ran into a Han (Vietnamese NÃm) character
which does not seem to be encoded yet, "slice" radical on left and
"heart" radical on right, and was wondering whether it would make
This is all thoroughly covered in TUS 3.0.
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 05:33 PM, Stefan Persson wrote:
> Can someone please tell me what the characters in the Ideographic
> description characters block are used for? Is U+2FF0 U+5973 ($B=w(B) U+5B50
>($B;R(B)
> identical to
Stefan,
> Can someone please tell me what the characters in the Ideographic
> description characters block are used for?
RTM: http://www.unicode.org/unicode/uni2book/ch10.pdf
> Is U+2FF0 U+5973 ($B=w(B) U+5B50 ($B;R(B)
> identical to U+597D ($B9%(B),
No. It constitutes a
Can someone please tell me what the characters in the Ideographic
description characters block are used for? Is U+2FF0 U+5973 ($B=w(B) U+5B50
($B;R(B)
identical to U+597D ($B9%(B), or do these character serve for a completely
different purpose? Does any font support the characters in this
20 matches
Mail list logo
