Re: Is that character *+A7AC LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCRIPT G ?

2013-01-10 Thread Otto Stolz
Hello, le 09/01/2013 18:07, Frédéric Grosshans a écrit : Yes, but I actually don't know. I'd really like to have some idea on those old printing techniques, but I fear we're drifting to off topic subjects... Am 2013-01-09 um 18:16 schrieb Frédéric Grosshans: Actually, the preceding tool

Re: Is that character *+A7AC LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCRIPT G ?

2013-01-10 Thread Asmus Freytag
On 1/10/2013 2:08 AM, Otto Stolz wrote: Hello, le 09/01/2013 18:07, Frédéric Grosshans a écrit : Yes, but I actually don't know. I'd really like to have some idea on those old printing techniques, but I fear we're drifting to off topic subjects... Am 2013-01-09 um 18:16 schrieb Frédéric

Re: Is that character *+A7AC LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCRIPT G ?

2013-01-10 Thread Frédéric Grosshans
Le 10/01/2013 11:08, Otto Stolz a écrit : Hello, le 09/01/2013 18:07, Frédéric Grosshans a écrit : Yes, but I actually don't know. I'd really like to have some idea on those old printing techniques, but I fear we're drifting to off topic subjects... Am 2013-01-09 um 18:16 schrieb Frédéric

Re: Is that character *+A7AC LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCRIPT G ?

2013-01-10 Thread Frédéric Grosshans
Le 10/01/2013 00:31, Asmus Freytag a écrit : Would you be able to provide a more complete copy of the article in question. It would allow those of us with the proper background to look for any other potential documents using the character in

Re: Is that character *+A7AC LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCRIPT G ?

2013-01-10 Thread Asmus Freytag
On 1/10/2013 5:21 AM, Frédéric Grosshans wrote: Le 10/01/2013 11:08, Otto Stolz a écrit : Hello, le 09/01/2013 18:07, Frédéric Grosshans a écrit : Yes, but I actually don't know. I'd really like to have some idea on those old printing techniques, but I fear we're drifting to off topic

Is that character *+A7AC LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCRIPT G ?

2013-01-09 Thread Frédéric Grosshans
Note: this post is better read in a font distinguishing the 2 following characters ɡ U+0261 LATIN SMALL LETTER SCRIPT G g U+0067 LATIN SMALL LETTER G If you follow this link : https://plus.google.com/photos/11730681874106261/albums/5831399570749921169?authkey=COmLzZr3vPmNigE you will

Re: Is that character *+A7AC LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCRIPT G ?

2013-01-09 Thread Michael Everson
On 9 Jan 2013, at 11:39, Frédéric Grosshans frederic.grossh...@gmail.com wrote: Note: this post is better read in a font distinguishing the 2 following characters ɡ U+0261 LATIN SMALL LETTER SCRIPT G g U+0067 LATIN SMALL LETTER G If you follow this link :

Re: Is that character *+A7AC LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCRIPT G ?

2013-01-09 Thread Frédéric Grosshans
Le 09/01/2013 13:32, Michael Everson a écrit : This example is obviously totally different, and too late to have any influence on the encoding, but I think it might interest some reader of this list. I don't see how it would influence the encoding. It's just more evidence of use in a

Re: Is that character *+A7AC LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCRIPT G ?

2013-01-09 Thread Andreas Stötzner
Am 09.01.2013 um 15:56 schrieb Frédéric Grosshans: My point is : in this text, this character is a capital letter which look like a g. Since this text do not make the character distinction between SMALL G and SCRIPT G, and treats them as glyph variants of SMALL G, the character shown here

Re: Is that character *+A7AC LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCRIPT G ?

2013-01-09 Thread Frédéric Grosshans
Le 09/01/2013 16:34, Andreas Stötzner a écrit : As far as I know mathematicians do not always constrain themselves to established characters, but tend to invent new ones for their own convenience

Re: Is that character *+A7AC LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCRIPT G ?

2013-01-09 Thread Frédéric Grosshans
Le 09/01/2013 17:38, Andreas Stötzner a écrit : So the actual origin of that ›Capital script G‹ may well have been custom handwriting invention.

Re: Is that character *+A7AC LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCRIPT G ?

2013-01-09 Thread Frédéric Grosshans
Le 09/01/2013 18:07, Frédéric Grosshans a écrit : Le 09/01/2013 17:38, Andreas Stötzner a écrit : So the actual origin of that ›Capital script