Re: Japanese scripts?

2000-10-30 Thread John Cowan
"Ayers, Mike" wrote: > "Effectively"? No. Katakana-only writing is just wrong, and > hiragana sans kanji (with or without katakana) is considered children's > writing. Is the Tale of Genji printed in kanji nowadays? -- There is / one art || John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTE

RE: Japanese scripts?

2000-10-30 Thread Ayers, Mike
> From: Shawn Halwes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Can Japanese be effectively represented with only the > Hiragana, and Katakana > scripts? > "Effectively"? No. Katakana-only writing is just wrong, and hiragana sans kanji (with or without katakana) is considered children's writing.

RE: Japanese scripts?

2000-10-27 Thread Carl W. Brown
, 2000 4:44 PM To: Unicode List Cc: Unicode List Subject: Re: Japanese scripts? Shawn: I'm a reader of a Unicode mailing list, and your query was passed to us for a response. At Friday, October 27, 2000 2:50 PM, you wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >Can Japanese be effectively represented with

Re: Japanese scripts?

2000-10-27 Thread Jim DeLaHunt
Shawn: I'm a reader of a Unicode mailing list, and your query was passed to us for a response. At Friday, October 27, 2000 2:50 PM, you wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >Can Japanese be effectively represented with only the Hiragana, and Katakana >scripts? Effectively, no. Strictly speaking, you c

Re: Japanese scripts?

2000-10-27 Thread Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
tion in VB at http://www.i18nWithVB.com/ - Original Message - From: "Magda Danish (Unicode)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Unicode List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 4:09 PM Subject: FW: Japanese scripts? > > > -Original Message

FW: Japanese scripts?

2000-10-27 Thread Magda Danish (Unicode)
-Original Message- From: Shawn Halwes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 2:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Japanese scripts? Can Japanese be effectively represented with only the Hiragana, and Katakana scripts? Thanks, Shawn Halwes