"Ayers, Mike" wrote:
> "Effectively"? No. Katakana-only writing is just wrong, and
> hiragana sans kanji (with or without katakana) is considered children's
> writing.
Is the Tale of Genji printed in kanji nowadays?
--
There is / one art || John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTE
> From: Shawn Halwes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> Can Japanese be effectively represented with only the
> Hiragana, and Katakana
> scripts?
>
"Effectively"? No. Katakana-only writing is just wrong, and
hiragana sans kanji (with or without katakana) is considered children's
writing.
, 2000 4:44 PM
To: Unicode List
Cc: Unicode List
Subject: Re: Japanese scripts?
Shawn:
I'm a reader of a Unicode mailing list, and your query was passed to us for
a response.
At Friday, October 27, 2000 2:50 PM, you wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>Can Japanese be effectively represented with
Shawn:
I'm a reader of a Unicode mailing list, and your query was passed to us for
a response.
At Friday, October 27, 2000 2:50 PM, you wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>Can Japanese be effectively represented with only the Hiragana, and Katakana
>scripts?
Effectively, no. Strictly speaking, you c
tion in VB at
http://www.i18nWithVB.com/
- Original Message -
From: "Magda Danish (Unicode)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Unicode List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 4:09 PM
Subject: FW: Japanese scripts?
>
>
> -Original Message
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Halwes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 2:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Japanese scripts?
Can Japanese be effectively represented with only the Hiragana, and Katakana
scripts?
Thanks,
Shawn Halwes
6 matches
Mail list logo