[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Unfortunately, there's no corresponding LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH LONG
> RIGHT LEG, which Lakota needs.
To my knowledge, the discussion in September between John Cowan and Curtis Clark
didn't terminate with any actual proposal, and I'm not clear on whether the above
assertion is a fact. I'm not saying I know anything about this field either. Does
Lakota REALLY need a letter that isn't in Unicode?
Are you in a position to provide documents and evidence, and/or make a definite
proposal for adding this character? It would be a good thing to add, if it's really
needed.
Rick
