Re: Lao Sign Pali Virama and vowels above

2019-05-21 Thread Richard Wordingham via Unicode
On Tue, 21 May 2019 00:36:33 + Andrew Glass via Unicode wrote: > This is because the sequences include U+0EBA which was added in > Unicode 12.0. Edge has not updated for Unicode 12 at this time. That suspicion was why I was hoping it was a temporary aberration. When it is so updated, will i

RE: Lao Sign Pali Virama and vowels above

2019-05-20 Thread Andrew Glass via Unicode
@unicode.org Subject: Re: Lao Sign Pali Virama and vowels above On Mon, 20 May 2019 22:53:36 +0100 Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote: > MS Edge is currently giving me dotted circles for the sequences > and UU>. I trust this is just a temporary aberration. Also with the sequence ,

Re: Lao Sign Pali Virama and vowels above

2019-05-20 Thread Richard Wordingham via Unicode
On Mon, 20 May 2019 22:53:36 +0100 Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote: > MS Edge is currently giving me dotted circles for the sequences > and UU>. I trust this is just a temporary aberration. Also with the sequence , as in the nominative singular ສັນທິຕ຺ຖ຺ິໂກ of ສັນທິຕ຺ຖ຺ິກະ, which trans

Lao Sign Pali Virama and vowels above

2019-05-20 Thread Richard Wordingham via Unicode
When a consonant bears both U+0EBA LAO SIGN PALI VIRAMA (acting as a nukta) and a vowel above, is there or is there intended to be any constraint on there relative order? While U+0EBA has canonical combining class 9, the vowels above have canonical combining class 0, so the order makes a differenc