On Tue, 21 May 2019 00:36:33 +
Andrew Glass via Unicode wrote:
> This is because the sequences include U+0EBA which was added in
> Unicode 12.0. Edge has not updated for Unicode 12 at this time.
That suspicion was why I was hoping it was a temporary aberration. When
it is so updated, will i
@unicode.org
Subject: Re: Lao Sign Pali Virama and vowels above
On Mon, 20 May 2019 22:53:36 +0100
Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
> MS Edge is currently giving me dotted circles for the sequences
> and UU>. I trust this is just a temporary aberration.
Also with the sequence ,
On Mon, 20 May 2019 22:53:36 +0100
Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
> MS Edge is currently giving me dotted circles for the sequences
> and UU>. I trust this is just a temporary aberration.
Also with the sequence , as in the
nominative singular ສັນທິຕ຺ຖ຺ິໂກ of ສັນທິຕ຺ຖ຺ິກະ, which trans
When a consonant bears both U+0EBA LAO SIGN PALI VIRAMA (acting as a
nukta) and a vowel above, is there or is there intended to be any
constraint on there relative order? While U+0EBA has canonical
combining class 9, the vowels above have canonical combining class 0,
so the order makes a differenc
4 matches
Mail list logo