At 01:13 PM 12/30/2003, Peter Kirk wrote:
But if it were, this ligature would be very interesting and problematic
because it is a ligature between a base character and a diacritic. This is
not a problem if it is always used, in a particular font, but it is
problematic if the ligature is
On 30/12/2003 11:44, John Hudson wrote:
At 11:15 AM 12/30/2003, Peter Kirk wrote:
Even if it were verified, it isn't a good case for encoding a
separate character *equivalent* to a combination of two existing
characters: that's a glyph variant ligature.
Actually, I don't think so. The
I wonder if there are other, better defined, cases of ligatures between
base characters and diacritics in other scripts, i.e. cases where there
is an optional alternative to base character plus diacritic which does
not look like the base character plus the diacritic.
Devangari?
Syllabe
3 matches
Mail list logo
