Update --> Regarding "MS Arial Unicode vs. MS Gothic (CJK)"

Hello, The problem reported yesterday - an incorrect glyph at U+7114 in "Arial Unicode MS" - occurs in an old version of the font. This has since been corrected. David Kilgrow (dkilgrow) Microsoft Typography, East Asian PM mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.microsoft.com/typography

RE: MS Arial Unicode vs. MS Gothic (CJK)

Sorry about that. I'll try again with an ordinary attachment... - rick -Original Message- From: Rick Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 16 January 2002 15:16 To: Unicode List Subject: RE: MS Arial Unicode vs. MS Gothic (CJK) When I insert these characters into

Re: MS Arial Unicode vs. MS Gothic (CJK)

Thank you for your replies. The answer is U+7114 seems to be incorrect in the Arial Unicode MS Font. (And, of course, MS Gothic is an unicode font.) Kay Genenz

RE: MS Arial Unicode vs. MS Gothic (CJK)

Title: RE: MS Arial Unicode vs. MS Gothic (CJK) When I insert these characters into Word 2002 and set the font to Arial Unicode MS, I see <<...OLE_Obj...>> - two different glyphs. - rick cameron -Original Message- From: SOS Uni Bonn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: W

MS Arial Unicode vs. MS Gothic (CJK)

I could not find sufficient information on unicode.org webpages, so please let me ask - just send me a link for further information Why do both of the characters coded 7130 and 7114 (焰 & 焔) (and probably others, too) appear in the shape of 7130 when using MS Arial Unicode in MS Office but in the