On 2 Feb 2015, at 23:31, Kent Karlsson wrote:
>> Hawaiian Hobbit, U+02BB has been drawn 133% taller, but of the same width, as
>> U+2018. I believe this really must be considered good practice. In these
>
> I think you mean 33 % taller, i.e. height 133 % relative to its "normal"
> height. 133 %
Den 2015-02-02 19:36, skrev "Michael Everson" :
> Hawaiian Hobbit, U+02BB has been drawn 133% taller, but of the same width, as
> U+2018. I believe this really must be considered good practice. In these
I think you mean 33 % taller, i.e. height 133 % relative to its "normal"
height. 133 % taller
ginal Message-
> From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of
> Christopher Fynn
> Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2015 10:13 PM
> To: Doug Ewell
> Cc: Markus Scherer; unicode@unicode.org
> Subject: Re: N'Ko - which character? 02BC vs. 2019
>
> If used as char
alf Of
>> Christopher Fynn
>> Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2015 10:13 PM
>> To: Doug Ewell
>> Cc: Markus Scherer; unicode@unicode.org
>> Subject: Re: N'Ko - which character? 02BC vs. 2019
>>
>> If used as characters that are part of a word, especially when they oc
On 31 Jan 2015, at 22:04, Markus Scherer wrote:
> Dear Unicoders, which is the proper second character in "N'Ko"?
> See below for details.
U+2019. It is not a letter in N’Ko. Moreover, the reference fonts for N’Ko
didn’t even have U+02BC.
For N’Ko, this is not arguable.
I would like to point
icode-boun...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Fynn
Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2015 10:13 PM
To: Doug Ewell
Cc: Markus Scherer; unicode@unicode.org
Subject: Re: N'Ko - which character? 02BC vs. 2019
If used as characters that are part of a word, especially when they occur at
the beginn
If used as characters that are part of a word, especially when they
occur at the beginning or end of a word, ASCII apostrophes and and
both right and left quotation marks easily get changed to something
else by the auto quotes features of word-processors.
___
Markus Scherer wrote:
Dear Unicoders, which is the proper second character in "N'Ko"?
See below for details.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Doug Ewell
For the record, I did not ask on ietf-languages for any re-evaluation of
the apostrophe character used in the name N'Ko. My
Dear Unicoders, which is the proper second character in "N'Ko"?
See below for details.
Thanks,
markus
-- Forwarded message --
From: Doug Ewell
Date: Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 9:16 AM
Subject: Apostrophes (was: Re: ISO 639-3 changes)
To: Philip Newton
Cc: ietf-langua...@iana.org
Phili
9 matches
Mail list logo
