On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 03:22 AM, Andrew C. West wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 02:03:27 -0800 (PST), "John H. Jenkins" wrote:
Nope. We're still doing modern stuff.
Well, there's no rush, just as long as you get round to it sometime
... how
about reserving a plane now anyway ?
Be
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 02:03:27 -0800 (PST), "John H. Jenkins" wrote:
> Nope. We're still doing modern stuff.
>
Well, there's no rush, just as long as you get round to it sometime ... how
about reserving a plane now anyway ?
> All in all, I wouldn't be surprised if there were as many as ten
> th
At 08:03 -0800 2002-11-12, Andrew C. West wrote:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 07:55:19 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, the document certainly implies that it is plane 3 for which the label
AIP is proposed, but it doesn't actually state this.
Sorry.
Nor does the document explain what is mean
At 13:01 -0500 2002-11-12, John Cowan wrote:
John H. Jenkins scripsit:
Beyond that, it is incredible just how many obscure characters there
> are once you start looking for them.
I am starting to get nervous. Earlier this year I made a bet about the
filling of planes 0-D within five years.
John H. Jenkins scripsit:
> Beyond that, it is incredible just how many obscure characters there
> are once you start looking for them.
I am starting to get nervous. Earlier this year I made a bet about the
filling of planes 0-D within five years. I took the negative, but you
make me wonder
On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 09:03 AM, Andrew C. West wrote:
BTW, what is "CJK Unified Ideographs Extension C" intended to include
? Surely
not any more ordinary Han ideographs - with over 70,000 ideographs
already
encoded, there can't be so many genuine ideographs that still need
encodi
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 07:55:19 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BTW, the document certainly implies that it is plane 3 for which the label
> AIP is proposed, but it doesn't actually state this.
>
Nor does the document explain what is meant by "Extension C" - I assume that
this means "CJK Un
On 11/12/2002 07:03:38 AM Michael Everson wrote:
>A new WG2 document:
>
>N2515 Recommendation to earmark Plane 3 in the Roadmap
> http://www.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n2515.pdf
Interesting. I note the following:
'For example, knowing which areas of Unicode and ISO/IEC 10646 are
earma
A new WG2 document:
N2515 Recommendation to earmark Plane 3 in the Roadmap
http://www.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n2515.pdf
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
9 matches
Mail list logo
