Re: N4106

2011-11-07 Thread Szelp A. Szabolcs
; combining marks. I would still consider splitting to be a needless > complication here, and instead encode begin/end pairs of combining > parentheses instead of what is in N4106. No, the usual and general way of handling this is, if the uni-width of parenthesis is not desirable for esthetic re

Re: N4106

2011-11-07 Thread Kent Karlsson
t-goes-on-both-sides of something that may have different widths in different instances. Of course you also need width info for combining marks. I would still consider splitting to be a needless complication here, and instead encode begin/end pairs of combining parentheses instead of what is in N410

Re: N4106

2011-11-07 Thread vanisaac
From: Kent Karlsson Den 2011-11-05 04:23, skrev "António Martins-Tuválkin" : > > I'm going through N4106 ( http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n4106.pdf ), > ... > > I see the following characters being put forward for proposing to be > encoded: > >

Re: N4106

2011-11-07 Thread Szelp A. Szabolcs
ombining mark solution would become more desirable. Szabolcs -- Szelp, André Szabolcs +43 (650) 79 22 400 On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 22:46, Kent Karlsson wrote: > > Den 2011-11-05 04:23, skrev "António Martins-Tuválkin" : > >> I'm going through N4106 ( http://s

Re: N4106

2011-11-06 Thread Kent Karlsson
Den 2011-11-05 04:23, skrev "António Martins-Tuválkin" : > I'm going through N4106 ( http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n4106.pdf ), ... I see the following characters being put forward for proposing to be encoded: 1ABB COMBINING PARENTHESES ABOVE 1ABC COMBINING DOUBLE

Re: N4106

2011-11-05 Thread Benjamin M Scarborough
My biggest issue with N4106 is that COMBINING LIGHT CENTRALIZATION STROKE BELOW and COMBINING STRONG CENTRALIZATION STROKE BELOW are given combining class 220 (below). The only reason this was done was so they could be used with the proposed COMBINING PARENTHESIS BELOW—that's it. N4106

Re: N4106

2011-11-04 Thread Philippe Verdy
2011/11/5 António Martins-Tuválkin : > I'm going through N4106 > ( http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n4106.pdf ), and enjoying very > much, as usual. Some questions: > * “Interesting” design at U+AB4C LATIN SMALL LETTER SCRIPT R WITH RING > —  maybe a "see also

N4106

2011-11-04 Thread António Martins-Tuválkin
I'm going through N4106 ( http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n4106.pdf ), and enjoying very much, as usual. Some questions: * There’s U+AB3D LATIN SMALL LETTER BLACKLETTER O, not unified with U+1D52C MATHEMATICAL FRAKTUR SMALL O, I see, as this is restricted to math use? (Ditto, m.m.,