At 12:36 PM -0700 7/27/01, John Hudson wrote:
>
>You might run into trouble with resource fork TTFs vs. data fork
>TTFs, depending on which version of the OS you are running. Data
>fork TTFs are the Windows standard, and resource fork TTFs were long
>the Apple standard. Mac OS X natively suppor
From: Myanmar Triumph Int'l Ltd. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 1. In each and every OS Platform (such as Microsoft Win9x, Win2K, Mac, IBM
> OS2, Unix, Linux etc...), is there anything like native font format?
That all depends what you mean by "native font format". All of th
At 00:35 7/28/2001 -0700, Myanmar Triumph Int'l Ltd. wrote:
>1. In each and every OS Platform (such as Microsoft Win9x, Win2K, Mac, IBM
>OS2, Unix, Linux etc...), is there anything like native font format?
Not as such. I think it would be fair to describe data fork TTFs as the
Win
ative font format?
(What drove me to ask this question is that AFAIK, .ttf was designed for
Apple Macintosh, then, I'd like to claim .ttf as a native font format of
Mac, Can I?.)
2. Can I claim .bdf (bitmap distribution format of Adobe) as a native font
format of Linux? And .pcf (Portable Compi
4 matches
Mail list logo