RE: Normalisation and Greek characters

2003-03-16 Thread David J. Perry
Thanks to John for pointing me in the right direction; the normalization charts were not helpful, but after spending some time with UAX#15 and looking at the actual Unicode database, I see what is going on here. It seems strange to me that the Unicode book (where I initially looked) simply gives

Normalisation and Greek characters

2003-03-15 Thread David J. Perry
U+03AC and U+1F71 both have canonical decompositions to U+03B1 followed by U+0301. (There are other similar pairs in the Greek blocks.) If an application applies normalisation form C both decompose to the same string; will the resulting recomposed character be 03AC or 1F71? I suspect the

Re: Normalisation and Greek characters

2003-03-15 Thread John Cowan
David J. Perry scripsit: U+03AC and U+1F71 both have canonical decompositions to U+03B1 followed by U+0301. (There are other similar pairs in the Greek blocks.) If an application applies normalisation form C both decompose to the same string; will the resulting recomposed character be 03AC

Re: Normalisation and Greek characters

2003-03-15 Thread Mark Davis
PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 09:36 Subject: Normalisation and Greek characters U+03AC and U+1F71 both have canonical decompositions to U+03B1 followed by U+0301. (There are other similar pairs in the Greek blocks.) If an application applies normalisation