On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, John H. Jenkins wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, June 5, 2002, at 07:27 AM, Adam Twardoch wrote:
>
> > Oh, thank you! I needed that figure to make a point why you cannot make a
> > single TrueType font covering all of the Unicode range. I knew it was way
> > more than 65,536, but i
On Wednesday, June 5, 2002, at 07:27 AM, Adam Twardoch wrote:
> Oh, thank you! I needed that figure to make a point why you cannot make a
> single TrueType font covering all of the Unicode range. I knew it was way
> more than 65,536, but it's better to quote a precise figure :)
>
Ah, but the fi
- Original Message -
> > How many characters does the current version of the Unicode Standard
> > enumerate?
>
> 95,156.
Oh, thank you! I needed that figure to make a point why you cannot make a
single TrueType font covering all of the Unicode range. I knew it was way
more than 65,536, b
Adam asked:
> How many characters does the current version of the Unicode Standard
> enumerate?
95,156.
>
> BTW: I think this information would be useful if it were always included in
> the summary of earch revision.
Agreed. The total was listed in Unicode 3.1 (94,140), and you could
get the
How many characters does the current version of the Unicode Standard
enumerate?
BTW: I think this information would be useful if it were always included in
the summary of earch revision.
Adam
5 matches
Mail list logo