On Dec 6, 2004, at 10:23 AM, Johannes Bergerhausen wrote:
From some discussions here i learned that Arial Unicode MS contains
about 50.000 glyphs,
which is about the size of characters encoded in Unicode 2.0 and was
shipped the last
time bundled with Office for Windows 2003.
A Pan-Unicode-Font
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf
> Of Johannes Bergerhausen
> A Pan-Unicode-Font is a beautiful idea.
>
> Why Microsoft/Monotype stopped the developpement of further versions?
Well, I cannot say that there will be no further development of Arial
Unicode MS. However,
James Kass wrote:
> Rajesh Chandrakar wrote about a display problem.
>
> I wrote:
>
> > This could be a font problem, an encoding problem on the
> > page in question, or a problem with the operating system
> > support.
> >
> > Here is the line in question reproduced in Unicode (UTF-8):
> >
> > वे
Rajesh Chandrakar wrote about a display problem.
I wrote:
> This could be a font problem, an encoding problem on the
> page in question, or a problem with the operating system
> support.
>
> Here is the line in question reproduced in Unicode (UTF-8):
>
> वेंकटाचलपते (निन्नु नम्मिति
Rajesh Chandrakar wrote:
> Is it your indication in this area is, separate fonts for
> all languages as true type? if yes, will it not create problem
> in indexing and searching of database?> > and what about
the storage of the data, will it not be messed
> in back end?
As long as standa
Rajesh Chandrakar wrote:
> ...
> but I can say about the Devanagari which is my mother
> language. Some "matras" such as "EE" and "U" of this language
> is not being represented in actual place, somewhere it is
> coming first and somewhere after than its actual place in
> words. Look at th
James Kass wrote:
Rajesh Chandrakar wrote:
> >
> > Another problem has to do with searching/indexing. Search/index
applications
> > are "broken" by non-Standard encodings.
>
> but how far searching and indexing is possible for encoded standards?
>
Hopefully, someone on our list with better knowl
"James E. Agenbroad" wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Rajesh Chandrakar wrote:
>
> >
> > James Kass wrote:
> >
> > > Adarsh wrote:
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > Another problem has to do with searching/indexing. Search/index
> > > applications
> > > are "broken" by non-Standard encodings.
> >
> >
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Rajesh Chandrakar wrote:
>
> James Kass wrote:
>
> > Adarsh wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > Another problem has to do with searching/indexing. Search/index
> > applications
> > are "broken" by non-Standard encodings.
>
> but how far searching and indexing is possible for e
Rajesh Chandrakar wrote:
> >
> > Another problem has to do with searching/indexing. Search/index applications
> > are "broken" by non-Standard encodings.
>
> but how far searching and indexing is possible for encoded standards?
>
Hopefully, someone on our list with better knowledge of search
e
James Kass wrote:
> Adarsh wrote:
>
> > With ArialUnicodeMS all the characters for indian languages are not given
> > and even rendering characters has become a problem.Actually i hope u know
> > that for devanagari the range is from 0901-096f but all the characters has
> > not been covered in t
Andrew Cunningham wrote:
> Hi Rajesh
>
> it cann't be done
>
> both Arial Unicode MS and Code2000 contain indic characters, but only those
> defined in the Unicode standard, the discret characters.
>
> If i remember correctly, the required conjuncts and ligatures for variious
> langauges are not
Adarsh wrote:
> With ArialUnicodeMS all the characters for indian languages are not given
> and even rendering characters has become a problem.Actually i hope u know
> that for devanagari the range is from 0901-096f but all the characters has
> not been covered in this range and unicode people h
Rajesh ChandrakarWrote:
>
> I am new user of this forum and I am exploring Unicode and it's
> application part with bibliographic databases. Right now, I have
> explored the use of Arial Unicode MS font with Netscape browser. Now my
> problem is, our centre has developed the Library housekeeping s
Rajesh Chandrakar wrote:
>
> I am new user of this forum and I am exploring Unicode and it's
> application part with bibliographic databases. Right now, I have
> explored the use of Arial Unicode MS font with Netscape browser. Now my
> problem is, our centre has developed the Library housekeepi
Well, I cannot speak for PowerBuilder (my knowledge of it is very out of
date), but for both Netscape and MS SQL Server you may or may not be able to
support Indic scripts -- the deciding factor will be based on what version
of each product you are using.
Beyond that, I do not think that any one
icode List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 3:35 PM
Subject: RE: Arial Unicode MS
> Well it's good to finally understand that problem. I'm using NT4.0 SP4. I
> understand I'll be using Windows 2000 sometime in the near future, so I'll
> wait
02, 2000 5:04 PM
To: Unicode List
Subject: Re: Arial Unicode MS
What version of Windows are you using? What service pack?
There is a bug in the font cache of NT4 that will cause problems if you have
too many fonts installed (especialy big fonts like this one). It will give
the very sympt
What version of Windows are you using? What service pack?
There is a bug in the font cache of NT4 that will cause problems if you have
too many fonts installed (especialy big fonts like this one). It will give
the very symptoms you discuss here.
Windows 2000 does not have this bug.
michka
Mich
You need to install NT4 SP5 or later to fix this.
Sent with Office2000 SR1 wordmail
-Original Message-
From: Dara Becker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 2:45 PM
To: Unicode List
Subject: Arial Unicode MS
Does anybody else have problems with Arial Unicode MS f
20 matches
Mail list logo
