RE: Convincing executives of character code perils

2000-10-25 Thread Carl W. Brown
J.P. X.Net, Inc. is a Globalization consulting company. We often get involved with a companies second attempt. It seems so easy just to localize your product and you are ready for the world market. This is an area where people have no experience and it seems like they have to get burned to

Re: Convincing executives of character code perils

2000-10-25 Thread Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
well, most of the post is opinion but I agree with a lot of it so that's okay. :-) This came with Win 95. Unfortunately MS was competing with IBM's OS/2 at the time and wanted good performance on a 4MB system. While they use Unicode internally they dropped Unicode support from the user API.

RE: Convincing executives of character code perils

2000-10-24 Thread Marco . Cimarosti
Well, my executives are mostly Italians or Dutchmen, so they are quite used to the perils of their own languages. Ouch! I have just bitten my tongue in the attempt of pronouncing a very dangerous Italian phoneme! I need medical assistance, fast! _ Ma?co -Original Message- From: J. P.

Re: Convincing executives of character code perils

2000-10-24 Thread Suzanne Topping
- Original Message - From: "J. P." [EMAIL PROTECTED] Articulating and expressing concerns to company executives about the perils associated with managing multiple character sets is DAUNTING task. The company would like to move ahead regardless, which tells me we haven't done a

Re: Convincing executives of character code perils

2000-10-24 Thread Tex Texin
Did you express your concerns about introducing additional architectures into your configuration, when you went from single platform to multi-platform? Weren't the execs concerned about interoperation between systems with such different code pages as EBCDIC and ASCII? Did those ready-aim-fire

Re: Convincing executives of character code perils

2000-10-24 Thread Tex Texin
Did you express your concerns about introducing additional architectures into your configuration, when you went from single platform to multi-platform? Weren't the execs concerned about interoperation between systems with such different code pages as EBCDIC and ASCII? Did those ready-aim-fire