Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:04:26 +0200
From: verd...@wanadoo.fr
To: pub...@khwilliamson.com; m...@macchiato.com
CC: due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp; asm...@ix.netcom.com; kent.karlsso...@telia.com;
unicode@unicode.org
For Arabic ther are clearly two separate sets of digits, but the
possibility
Mark
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 05:57, Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Martin J. Dürst due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp wrote:
On 2010/07/29 13:33, karl williamson wrote:
Asmus Freytag wrote:
On 7/25/2010 6:05 PM, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
Well,
Mark Davis ☕ m...@macchiato.com
It is not so strange. Read
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr24/proposed.html#Multiple_Script_Values,
and other parts of #24 describing Common.
It is exactly because I had read this proposed update for UTS#24 that
I used my argument (if not, I would have not
That just really isn't a script issue; it is more an issue of which language
orthographies use which characters, and we have provision for that
information in CLDR.
Mark
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 09:07, Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Mark Davis ☕
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:57:17 +0200
Subject: Digit/letter variants in the same unified script (was: stability
policy on numeric type = decimal)
From: verd...@wanadoo.fr
To: due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp; pub...@khwilliamson.com
CC: asm...@ix.netcom.com; kent.karlsso...@telia.com;
Mark Davis ☕ wrote:
Mark
/— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —/
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 05:57, Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr
mailto:verd...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Martin J. Dürst due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp
mailto:due...@it.aoyama.ac.jp wrote:
On 2010/07/29 13:33, karl
Asmus Freytag wrote:
Having Nd be limited to characters that
a) are used in decimal radix numbers
b) are part of a complete, ordered sequence 0..9
would make this property regular enough to serve
implementers. You could script the creation of
relevant data for your implementation based on that
karl williamson pub...@khwilliamson.com wrote:
This discussion doesn't make sense to me. The original proposal to
encode 19DA says that there is one set of digits in New Tai Lue, but
there is an extra digit '1' (the one that got put at 19DA), used when
the other digit '1' is visually
8 matches
Mail list logo
