Hello
I wrote: “1st possibility: a separate script. There’ll be no problem.”
You wrote: “There would, because the bulk of the script would look just
like Latin, and the encoding committees consider this to be a security
issue for internet spoofing for instance.”
I don’t understand.
Internet sp
Actually, I just noticed that Hupa and Yurok have TLE sorted after Y, so point
ϛʹ is moot.
—Ben Scarborough
I do have a few comments and questions I'd like to make about N4262.
αʹ) I think LATIN LETTER TURNED-E R should be disunified from U+025A LATIN
LETTER SCHWA WITH HOOK. I don't think the identity of the new capital character
matches the established identity of U+025A. Of the five glyphs provided
On 30 May 2012, at 20:46, Doug Ewell wrote:
> N4262 says the same, and so do practically all proposal forms in response to
> that question, no matter how similar any of the characters are to others in
> appearance or function. I think authors know it's a big red flag if they say
> "Yes."
That,
Michael Everson wrote:
>> “10a. Can any of the proposed character(s) be considered to be
>> similar (in appearance or function) to an existing character?”
>> “No.”
>> I’m a little surprised. If the 2nd possibility was envisioned, isn’t
>> it because many Unifon letters are similar in appearance a
5 matches
Mail list logo
