> This looks like a nice endorsement of SCSU: :D
> It saves 59% just as a charset, > and it saves almost 20% in a system with a "real compression". I am all for SCSU as a charset (after my tools can view it properly), but that was not the use there. OTOH there is gzip encoding in HTTP 1.1 :) Seriously, SCSU is fine for some uses, but in this example, was definitely not the best way to appreciate a reduction in file size. By the 20% you mean an additional 20% by doing SCSU+gzip versus just gzip, right? YA
