Re: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude

2001-05-04 Thread James Kass
Doug Ewell wrote: > Memorizing the 128 8-bit characters above ASCII is decimal > was (relatively) not too difficult. Even today, when typing > á é í ó ú, I am likely to use Alt+160, Alt+130, Alt+161, > Alt+162, and Alt+163 repectively (as I just did). > Doing this with the whole BMP is quite an

Inserting ZWNJ (was Re: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude)

2001-05-04 Thread Edward Cherlin
At 9:20 AM +0400 5/4/01, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: >I do it much easier. In Word XP try the following: >Insert/Symbol/Special Characters >Choose "No-Width Optional Break" >Then press the button "Shortcut key" and associate with it whatever >combination you like. >I use Alt+J because it is easy to rem

Re: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude

2001-05-03 Thread Vladimir Ivanov
> On Thu, 3 May 2001, James Kass wrote: > > > So, tried using Windows 2000 character map > > feature. It's possible to select a single character this way, > > but for some reason a CR-LF is added when copying with > > Control-V. (This is true even with displayable characters > > or character st

Re: Adding Unicode characters to keyboard (was RE: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude)

2001-05-03 Thread Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
From: "Edward Cherlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > OK, I tried my own advice, and this is the macro code I got back: > > Selection.TypeText Text:=ChrW(8204) > > I don't claim to understand this code entirely, but it does seem to > work for Word 2000 under Windows 2000. That is, setting the cursor > bet

Re: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude

2001-05-03 Thread DougEwell2
In a message dated 2001-05-03 11:09:38 Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Special characters on PCs have been entered in this fashion > since before Windows, and this might have been one of the > reasons that decimal numbers were originally chosen for > HTML notation -- users

RE: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude

2001-05-03 Thread Edward Cherlin
At 12:28 AM +0430 5/4/01, Roozbeh Pournader wrote: >On Thu, 3 May 2001, Marco Cimarosti wrote: > >> But the same thing does not work in, e.g., the Notepad program coming with >> NT 4. Crazily enough, it also doesn't work in some other Office 2000 apps, >> like Word. > >It also doesn't work in W

Re: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude

2001-05-03 Thread Roozbeh Pournader
On Thu, 3 May 2001, James Kass wrote: > So, tried using Windows 2000 character map > feature. It's possible to select a single character this way, > but for some reason a CR-LF is added when copying with > Control-V. (This is true even with displayable characters > or character strings, unfor

Re: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude

2001-05-03 Thread James Kass
Roozbeh Pournader wrote: (May 03, 2001 12:58 PM) > > It also doesn't work in Word 2000 over Windows 2000 which my colleagues > are using for preparing their documents. Anyone knows a method? (It's > really a pain that Microsoft's Farsi keyboard doesn't have ZWNJ on it.) > Thought it should

Re: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude

2001-05-03 Thread James Kass
Mike Ayers wrote: >Please double check that. On my machine they appear to be numbers >20001 through 20006. It would be interesting if we were getting different >characters on the same keystrokes... Oops, 20001 through 20006 is right, and *WordPad*, not Word. On Monday, I downloaded a partial

RE: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude

2001-05-03 Thread Ayers, Mike
> From: Roozbeh Pournader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On Thu, 3 May 2001, Marco Cimarosti wrote: > > > But the same thing does not work in, e.g., the Notepad > program coming with > > NT 4. Crazily enough, it also doesn't work in some other > Office 2000 apps, > > like Word. > > It also d

RE: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude

2001-05-03 Thread Ayers, Mike
> From: James Kass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > In Windows Millennium Edition, the ALT+NCR method works > in Word without Office. These characters: "両丢丣两严並" were > entered from the keyboard in that fashion and are decimal > numbers 2 through 20005. Please double check that. On

RE: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude

2001-05-03 Thread Roozbeh Pournader
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Marco Cimarosti wrote: > But the same thing does not work in, e.g., the Notepad program coming with > NT 4. Crazily enough, it also doesn't work in some other Office 2000 apps, > like Word. It also doesn't work in Word 2000 over Windows 2000 which my colleagues are using fo

Re: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude

2001-05-03 Thread James Kass
Marco Cimarosti wrote: >John Cowan wrote: >> There is no general way in pre-W2000 versions of Windows to >> enter characters using Unicode codes. > Windows 3.1 and any DOS hex editor? Cumbersome... >Funny thing... It seems that we are both right in part: it depends on the >application. > >I h

RE: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude

2001-05-03 Thread Marco Cimarosti
John Cowan wrote: > There is no general way in pre-W2000 versions of Windows to > enter characters using Unicode codes. Funny thing... It seems that we are both right in part: it depends on the application. I have Windows NT 4.0, but installed Office 2000. In Outlook 2000, I can type ALT+01488

RE: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude

2001-05-03 Thread Marco Cimarosti
Yves Arrouye wrote: > BTW, anybody knows how to input characters on Windows using the hex > codepoint? I know it's good for my brain to do the exercise > of going from > hexadecimal to decimal, but it is still a pain to have to > type ALT- > when all I have in my book is hex. That would be a rea

RE: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude

2001-05-03 Thread Yves Arrouye
BTW, anybody knows how to input characters on Windows using the hex codepoint? I know it's good for my brain to do the exercise of going from hexadecimal to decimal, but it is still a pain to have to type ALT- when all I have in my book is hex. That would be a reason for providing the decimal valu

Re: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude

2001-04-27 Thread DougEwell2
In a message dated 2001-04-27 4:22:51 Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > 1bc> Why don't you make the next print edition of the Unicode > 1bc> standard (not to mention online) with Unicodepoints > 1bc> in decimal as well as hex? > > In fact, I do not see any reason to use hex