From: "kefas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> That is easily done by assigning the U-codes to some
> keys on the keyboard, but I dont know how to combine
> this with the pressing and releasing of CAPS.
> MSKBLC.exe , keyboard-layout-creator, does not allow
> for that.
Hmmm actually, if one puts the alt
See inserted remarks.
On Sunday 31 October 2004 05:05 am, you wrote:
> If you're going to quote an rtl phrase in an ltr
> context, you want to use an embedding. In plaintext,
> this would mean putting an RLE (U+202B) character
> before the phrase and a PDF (U+202C)after it.
That is easily done by
RtL-characters are a major break-through in Unicode!
Please see inserted remarks to your comments!
On Monday 01 November 2004 10:16 pm, you wrote:
> From: "kefas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Inserting unicode/basic-hebrew reults in a
> > convinient RtL, right-to-left, advance of the
> > cursor, but
Doug Ewell scripsit:
> I've never understood why writing Hebrew or Arabic left-to-right is
> called "visual" order anyway. These are RTL scripts; they are supposed
> to be not only written, but also read, right-to-left. Wouldn't a reader
> of Hebrew or Arabic consider RTL to BE the "visual" orde
> I've never understood why writing Hebrew or Arabic left-to-right is
> called "visual" order anyway. These are RTL scripts; they are supposed
> to be not only written, but also read, right-to-left. Wouldn't a reader
> of Hebrew or Arabic consider RTL to BE the "visual" order?
I see it thusly:
At 09:48 PM 11/1/2004, Doug Ewell wrote:
Philippe Verdy wrote:
> Visual entry should never be used. It was used for some legacy
> encodings to render text on devices that don't implement the Bidi
> algorithm and can only render text as LTR. Nobody enters RTL text in
> "pseudo-visual" LTR order; on
Philippe Verdy wrote:
> Visual entry should never be used. It was used for some legacy
> encodings to render text on devices that don't implement the Bidi
> algorithm and can only render text as LTR. Nobody enters RTL text in
> "pseudo-visual" LTR order; only the logical input order is needed.
I
From: "kefas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Inserting unicode/basic-hebrew reults in a convinient
RtL, right-to-left, advance of the cursor, but the
space-character jumps to the far right. Is there a
RtL-space?
In MS-Word and OpenOffice I can only change whole
paragraphs to RtL-entry. But quoting just a f
fantasai wrote:
> kefas wrote:
>> Inserting unicode/basic-hebrew reults in a convinient
>> RtL, right-to-left, advance of the cursor, but the
>> space-character jumps to the far right. Is there a
>> RtL-space?
>> In MS-Word and OpenOffice I can only change whole
>> paragraphs to RtL-entry. But
kefas wrote:
Inserting unicode/basic-hebrew reults in a convinient
RtL, right-to-left, advance of the cursor, but the
space-character jumps to the far right. Is there a
RtL-space?
In MS-Word and OpenOffice I can only change whole
paragraphs to RtL-entry. But quoting just a few
words in hebr
MS Word "guesses" whether the space is RTL or LTR. When the keyboard is set
to Hebrew or Arabic, space is RTL.
Jony
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kefas
> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 5:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
11 matches
Mail list logo
