On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 15:59:18 +0200
Philippe Verdy wrote:
> 2011/7/1 Richard Wordingham :
> > I wonder if anyone has some statistics on the use of CGJ. Its
> > revised intended use was to disrupt collating sequences, but you
> > may be right about its most frequent use being to disrupt canonical
>
2011/7/1 Richard Wordingham :
> I wonder if anyone has some statistics on the use of CGJ. Its revised
> intended use was to disrupt collating sequences, but you may be right
> about its most frequent use being to disrupt canonical reordering. A
> few years ago I concluded it wasn't yet safe to ty
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 04:22:59 +0200
Philippe Verdy wrote:
> 2011/7/1 Richard Wordingham :
> > Its main purpose is to indicate that a sequence of characters do
> > not form a collating unit. However, if one is using a 'monospace'
> > font to space 'letters' uniformly, i.e. to space collating
> > s
2011/7/1 Richard Wordingham :
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 01:57:46 +0200
> Philippe Verdy wrote:
>
>> CGJ is NOT made to create (or even hint) ligatures ; and certainly not
>> in this context.
>
> Its main purpose is to indicate that a sequence of characters do
> not form a collating unit. However, if o
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 01:57:46 +0200
Philippe Verdy wrote:
> CGJ is NOT made to create (or even hint) ligatures ; and certainly not
> in this context.
Its main purpose is to indicate that a sequence of characters do
not form a collating unit. However, if one is using a 'monospace' font
to space 'l
CGJ is NOT made to create (or even hint) ligatures ; and certainly not
in this context.
Anyway, there's not need for such ligatures in Breton, except in very
limited contexts (even in crosswords, you would encode the digram CH
or trigram C’H directly in each square, even for vertical words, but
ev
On 30 June 2011 07:59, Richard Wordingham
wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 03:49:42 +
> Peter Constable wrote:
>>
>> That would appear to be a limitation of the input method.
>
> It is indeed a limitation of X. I get round it on Ubuntu by using
> IBus and KMFL (Keyman for Linux), which then allo
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 03:49:42 +
Peter Constable wrote:
> From: unicode-bou...@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bou...@unicode.org]
> On Behalf Of Jean-François Colson
>
> > * In the C’HWERTY layout on Linux, the digraph and trigraph had to
> > be replaced by six PUA characters
>
> That would app
From: unicode-bou...@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bou...@unicode.org] On Behalf
Of Jean-François Colson
> * In the C’HWERTY layout on Linux, the digraph and trigraph had to be
> replaced
> by six PUA characters
That would appear to be a limitation of the input method. In principle, there's
no
On 28 Jun, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Jean-François Colson wrote:
> * In the C’HWERTY layout on Linux, the digraph and trigraph had to be
> replaced by six PUA characters and an input method such as xim must be used
> to get the correct character sequences. Since they are PUA characters, those
> subst
10 matches
Mail list logo
