Philippe...
Thanks for your concern but,
1. This isn't the forum for analyzing virus spam. Please you, and everyone
else, let's try to keep this list tolerably on topic.
2. A virus in fact *did* transit this system, and your analysis is rather
wrong in several points. But since this isn't th
RE: good morningMike Ayers wrote:
> > This mail (containing a virus: shower_response.exe) was sent to me
> > through [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> > Received: from 209.235.17.55 (EHLO unicode.org) (209.235.17.55)
> >by mta150.mail.dcn.yahoo.com with SMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2004
> >05:17:31 -0700
> >
Mike Ayers and Stefan Persson,
On Friday, yes, two virus e-mails went to the list, via
forged e-mail addresses of subscribers. We have no filtering
for subscribers on this server.
In future, please refrain from reporting viruses to the list.
Please report them directly to me, and I will remove th
Title: RE: good morning
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Stefan Persson
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 6:47 AM
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > classroom test of you?
I searched my archives of the Unicode list, and could not fi
dear Stefan,
Is this a 'bom-melding' or a 'bommel-ding'??
groetjes, Rein
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Stefan Persson wrote:
>c
>Is there no kind of filter that sorts out viruses from the list?
>
>Stefan
>
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
classroom test of you?
This mail (containing a virus: shower_response.exe) was sent to me
through [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Received: from 209.235.17.55 (EHLO unicode.org) (209.235.17.55)
by mta150.mail.dcn.yahoo.com with SMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 05:17:31 -0700
Received: from s
6 matches
Mail list logo
