On 01/11/2016 10:55 PM, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote:
Looks that way to me too. Can you submit this as feedback?
will do
{phone}
On Jan 12, 2016 00:39, "Karl Williamson" mailto:pub...@khwilliamson.com>> wrote:
Example 7 in http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr14/#Examples
has these two rules
Looks that way to me too. Can you submit this as feedback?
{phone}
On Jan 12, 2016 00:39, "Karl Williamson" wrote:
> Example 7 in http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr14/#Examples
>
> has these two rules
>
> NU × (NU | SY | IS)
>
> NU (NU | SY | IS)* × (NU | SY | IS | CL | CP )
>
> It appears to me
Example 7 in http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr14/#Examples
has these two rules
NU × (NU | SY | IS)
NU (NU | SY | IS)* × (NU | SY | IS | CL | CP )
It appears to me that the first rule generates a subset of what the 2nd
rule generates, and so is useless. It could be hence removed for
simplici
3 matches
Mail list logo
