Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit: > But is there some > reason we call this the Latin script instead of the Roman script? Not > that I'm suggesting we change it now, of course. I'm just curious.
Primarily because "roman" is used in opposition to "italic" as the name of a font face, so "Cyrillic roman" is a sensible notion. We do still call transliteration into the Latin script "romanization", though. > Some non-Unicode such use names like MacRoman instead of MacLatin. Plenty of precedent for that. -- You are a child of the universe no less John Cowan than the trees and all other acyclic http://www.reutershealth.com graphs; you have a right to be here. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan --DeXiderata by Sean McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
