RE: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations

2001-04-12 Thread Carl W. Brown
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Berthold Frommann Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 1:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations Carl, > I have lamented the lack of a good IME interface to capture ruby as the text &

Re: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations

2001-04-11 Thread Berthold Frommann
Carl, > I have lamented the lack of a good IME interface to capture ruby as the text > is entered. If nothing else they can be useful for some types of sorting. But in case of e.g. Japanese, this would definitely not work out in every text. If a particular word is not included in the dictionary

Re: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations

2001-04-11 Thread Berthold Frommann
Hello! > I know that there > are romanizations, which would be good for English-speaking students, > but not very useful for Chinese, I think (the only Chinese I have ever > met who could read romanizations were Chinese language teachers). Is > ruby used at all in native Chinese contexts? Well,

RE: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations

2001-04-11 Thread Ayers, Mike
> From: Martin Duerst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > At 10:00 01/04/09 -0700, Carl W. Brown wrote: > >I am wondering how in the absence of a sub language how one > should render > >Chinese ruby. Mandarin ruby will not do a Cantonese reader > much good. Can > >I specify multiple ruby and then

RE: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations

2001-04-10 Thread Martin Duerst
At 10:00 01/04/09 -0700, Carl W. Brown wrote: >I am wondering how in the absence of a sub language how one should render >Chinese ruby. Mandarin ruby will not do a Cantonese reader much good. Can >I specify multiple ruby and then have one displayed depending on the spoken >language? Maybe that'

RE: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations

2001-04-09 Thread Carl W. Brown
8:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations Ruby Annotation (http://www.w3.org/TR/ruby) and XHTML(TM) 1.1 - Module-based XHTML (http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11) became W3C Proposed Recommendations on April 6, 2001. Abstract of '

Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations

2001-04-08 Thread Martin Duerst
Ruby Annotation (http://www.w3.org/TR/ruby) and XHTML(TM) 1.1 - Module-based XHTML (http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11) became W3C Proposed Recommendations on April 6, 2001. Abstract of 'Ruby Annotation': "Ruby" are short runs of text alongside the base text, typically used in East Asian documents to