My comment is inserted after the first paragraph.
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
[snip]
> Look, let's consider again what problem we are trying to solve
> here. We have two funky forms from the ALA-LC transliteration
> tables, for which we haven't he
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
> Peter said:
>
> > >This stuff *can* all be handled with appropriately designed
> > >ligations in fonts, so there are options for display:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ==>
> > > maps via ligation table to:
> > >
> > >{t-s-tie-ligature-with-dot-above}
> >The ALA-LC conventions are not the only alternatives available for
> >representation of Abkhaz and/or Khanty/Mansi data in romanization.
> >In fact, you can find such data on the web using alternative
> >romanizations. So it isn't as if the current gap in figuring out
> >precisely how, in Unico
>The ALA-LC conventions are not the only alternatives available for
>representation of Abkhaz and/or Khanty/Mansi data in romanization.
>In fact, you can find such data on the web using alternative
>romanizations. So it isn't as if the current gap in figuring out
>precisely how, in Unicode, to rep
4 matches
Mail list logo
