Am 17.11.2014 um 08:35 schrieb Mark Davis ☕️:
IT’S EASY TO DISMISS EMOJI. They are, at first glance, ridiculous
The only ridiculous thing is to name them “Emoji” outside Japan.
They’re just signs and that’s it.
Regards,
Andreas Stötzner.
Sign is too general. The word has no less than 12 meanings, and can
refer e.g. to many Unicode characters that are not emojis (the sharp
sign, the less-than sign).[1]
It's useful to have a specialized word referring specifically to the new
pictograms used to color electronic messages with
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Andreas Stötzner a...@signographie.de wrote:
Am 17.11.2014 um 11:46 schrieb Leonardo Boiko:
Sign is too general
in its generality it is just perfect. The sets of signs in question are most
general, covering much more matters, objects and topics than the
2014-11-17 9:08 GMT-02:00 Magnus Bodin ☀ mag...@bodin.org:
Just to clarify. The transcribed form ji in the japanese emoji word
絵文字 is probably not from mandarin, since 字 is pronounced zi in mandarin.
Is it pronounced ji in an other chinese language?
Japanese doesn't usually borrow from
Thanks for a very good clarification.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Leonardo Boiko leobo...@namakajiri.net
wrote:
2014-11-17 9:08 GMT-02:00 Magnus Bodin ☀ mag...@bodin.org:
Just to clarify. The transcribed form ji in the japanese emoji word
絵文字 is probably not from mandarin, since 字 is
2014-11-17 9:10 GMT-02:00 Andreas Stötzner a...@signographie.de:
[sign] in its generality it is just perfect. […] At least, we should (in
English) speak of Emoticons and not Emoji. […] if precise terming is tricky
I find it better to generalize
These are your opinions. I find them to be
On Mon Nov 17 2014 at 12:15:08 PM Andreas Stötzner a...@signographie.de
wrote:
Am 17.11.2014 um 11:46 schrieb Leonardo Boiko:
Sign is too general
in its generality it is just perfect. The sets of signs in question are
most general, covering much more matters, objects and topics than the
I agree (except for the derivation of emoji).
On Mon Nov 17 2014 at 11:46:58 AM Leonardo Boiko leobo...@namakajiri.net
wrote:
Sign is too general. The word has no less than 12 meanings, and can
refer e.g. to many Unicode characters that are not emojis (the sharp
sign, the less-than sign).[1]
‘tomatoes’.
Peter
From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-boun...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Stötzner
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 2:09 AM
To: Mark Davis ☕️
Cc: unicode@unicode.org
Subject: Re: The rapid … erosion of definition ability
Am 17.11.2014 um 08:35 schrieb Mark Davis ☕️:
IT’S EASY
9 matches
Mail list logo
