On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Kass) wrote:
[...]
> Problem solved?
Perhaps :-)
Have a look at gucharmap:
http://gucharmap.sourceforge.net/
http://packages.debian.org/testing/x11/gucharmap
available both for Linux and Windows.
It's not ideal, in my opinion it m
Kenneth Whistler wrote,
> > Anyone who wants Unibook for Mac or Unibook for Unix is free to
> > take the concept and go off and write it in your spare time. And
> > if you architect it with a platform-independent system wrapper,
> > so much the better.
Marion Gunn wrote,
> ... I belong to a
I understand. Should have put my question less bluntly? I belong to a
group some of whose members seem to be able to make just about anything
run on anything, no thanks to me, so I assumed the same expertise to be
available within Unicode, only to have some volunteer(s) from within the
ranks of UC
Just a note of thanks to many of you who have sent me useful feedback. I
also found out
that my update to the archive had gone awry, but am happy to point out now that
http://www.unicode.org/unibook/Unibook-4.0.1.zip
is finally the correct version.
A./
Philippe waxed lyrical about the advantages of platform-independent
development:
> Isn't Java hiding most of these platform details, by providing unified
> support for platform-specific look and feel? Aren't there now many PLAF and
> themes manager available with automatic default selection of t
From: "Doug Ewell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Marion Gunn wrote:
Is it really so hard
to make multi-platform, open-office-type utilities?
Actually, yes, it is. Mac users don't want an application to be too
Windows-like, Windows users don't want an application to be too Mac-like
(we'll see how the latest
Scríobh Asmus Freytag:
> I'm glad you like it. I've been told previously by experienced Mac users
> that it runs fine with Virtual PC on the Mac.
Nothing runs fine with Virtual PC on the Mac, except things which run
fine with Virtual PC on the Mac (meaning it's too memory greedy to run
normal, es
Marion Gunn wrote:
> Is it really so hard
> to make multi-platform, open-office-type utilities?
Actually, yes, it is. Mac users don't want an application to be too
Windows-like, Windows users don't want an application to be too Mac-like
(we'll see how the latest version of Photoshop goes over),
At 04:32 AM 9/16/2004, Marion Gunn wrote:
Lovely browser. Is it possible to obtain a Mac-friendly version?
mg
I'm glad you like it. I've been told previously by experienced Mac users
that it runs fine with Virtual PC on the Mac.
A./
PS: To those of you who downloaded 4.0.1 already, the zip archiv
Lovely browser. Is it possible to obtain a Mac-friendly version?
mg
Scríobh Asmus Freytag:
>
> I've updated Unibook to version 4.0.1
>
> The latest version reads more property files and can display some of the
> new 4.0.1 properties.
> There are new ways to combine properties.
>
> As before, y
I've updated Unibook to version 4.0.1
The latest version reads more property files and can display some of the
new 4.0.1 properties.
There are new ways to combine properties.
As before, you can cut&paste either the character code or the character
name of a selected character to the clipboard. Al
11 matches
Mail list logo