Unicode 4.0 and ISO10646-2003

2004-04-22 Thread Frank Yung-Fong Tang
I saw the announcment of publishing " ISO/IEC 10646: 2003, Information technology -- Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS)" >From http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/open/02n3729.htm I expect there are no difference from Unicode 4.0, am I right?

Re: Unicode 4.0 and ISO10646-2003

2004-04-22 Thread Kenneth Whistler
Frank asked: I expect there are no difference from Unicode 4.0, am I right? Correct. Please see Appendix C of Unicode 4.0, p. 1348 and p. 1350, which already explicitly makes this statement. --Ken P.S. Frank, please don't use HTML email for inquiries like this to the Unicode list --

Re: Unicode 4.0 and ISO10646-2003

2004-04-22 Thread Asmus Freytag
At 10:44 AM 4/22/2004, Frank Yung-Fong Tang wrote: I saw the announcment of publishing ISO/IEC 10646: 2003, Information technology -- Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS) From http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/open/02n3729.htm I expect there are no difference from Unicode 4.0,

Re: Unicode 4.0 and ISO10646-2003

2004-04-22 Thread Frank Yung-Fong Tang
Kenneth Whistler wrote on 4/22/2004, 3:26 PM: Frank asked: I expect there are no difference from Unicode 4.0, am I right? Correct. Please see Appendix C of Unicode 4.0, p. 1348 and p. 1350, which already explicitly makes this statement. --Ken I don't see ISO10646-2003 in the